Current Issue

Chapter News
Features
Viewpoints
Student Views
From the Editor's Desk
Message from the President
Reviews
Society Notes & Community Announcements




 Article Archives 

Book Review
Career Development
Case Studies
Content Management
Contracting & Consulting
Core Competencies
Meeting Reviews
Usability
Networking
Online Help & Embedded Assistance
Technologies
Translation and Localization
Up and Coming Corner
Information Architecture


 Past Issues 

February, 2013
January, 2013
November, 2012
October, 2012
August, 2012
June, 2012
May, 2012
April, 2012
March, 2012
February, 2012
December, 2011
November, 2011
October, 2011
September, 2011
August, 2011
June, 2011
April, 2011
February, 2011
January, 2011
August, 2010
July, 2010
June, 2010
May, 2010
April, 2010
March, 2010
February, 2010
January, 2010
December, 2009
November, 2009
October, 2009
September, 2009
July, 2009
June, 2009
May, 2009
April, 2009
March, 2009
February, 2009
December, 2008
October, 2008
September, 2008
May, 2008
April, 2008
February, 2008
January, 2008
November, 2007
September, 2007
August, 2007
April, 2007
March, 2007
January, 2007

April program report: The Content Strategy Paradox

Share on Facebook :: Printer Friendly Version

Article by Josh Stubbs, Photos by Marika Piehler

Published: May 2012 in Meeting Reviews

Many companies treat content like tissues—use once then toss.

Rahel Baille, a vocal advocate of content strategy, addressed its challenges. Realizing the connection between business communications, technical communication, information architecture, usability, and content and information management enabled her to develop the role of content strategist. However, most companies tackle content strategy from the angle of web design or marketing. Rarely is actual content addressed.

In fact, companies do not agree on what content is. Some think of content as every piece of written material from online help to social media materials. Programmers may think of content as data between tags. To relate, Rahel told of wearing a nerdy T-shirt where the slogan was enclosed in XML tags. Those wandering the conference floor parsed the tags and simply acknowledged “Valid!” Point taken. Content unnoticed.

Cycle v chain
Given that content can have a variety of uses and contexts, it is important that a strategy be in place to measure its full value. Rahel pointed out that many companies treat content like tissues—use once then toss. Proper content management treats content in different ways and uses it several times over. Content management should be thought as more of a cycle than a chain. A system that governs the management of the content through the entire cycle should be repeatable.
Assess and specialize
Since content can be used in so many ways, there can be many specializations. Within content management there is DITA, online help systems, and Rahel likened this to the specializations in medicine. After receiving a basis in medicine, a student may then specialize in plastic surgery, podiatry, or psychiatry. Beyond the general background, there may not be any overlap in what medical specialists offer patients. The common basis shared by content managers should be the ability to recognize good content.
Auditing is not for amateurs
Considering how many ways are available to manage content, it should be assigned to someone with a strong understanding of the goals and strategy for this content. Despite corporate thinking that content management is as simple as training a few employees on CMS software, content management is too complex to leave to amateurs. As Rahel pointed out, these decision-makers haven’t grasped how to use styles in Word.
Since so many options are available an audit would need to be conducted to determine what content is needed. Returning to the medicine comparison, you wouldn’t need to see a plastic surgeon, podiatrist, and psychiatrist for the flu just because those options were available. The audit is also key in defining project deliverables (as deliverables are needed to get paid).

Improving content passionately
Rahel then presented some examples of poor content management from a national air carrier and a public utility, one of which improved after she applied her CM expertise. Good examples of content management included instructional videos, written instruction, and referrals to similar articles and even videos hosted on YouTube. She understood that proper content management was really about serving a customer. Whether designing a system for a home appliance or a public utility, Rahel spoke passionately and engagingly about the need for an overall content strategy. How dedicated is Rahel to all things content? The presentation concluded with image of her licence plate “XML”.

Previous: March 2012 Digest

Next: April 2012 Digest


 Subscribe via RSS

Visit the main STC website.

STC advances the theory and practice of technical communication across all user abilities and all media.


STC-related links

Note: You may need to be logged into these services to view the pages.

©2018 STC CWC | Home | .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)